Archive for the Labor Law Category

What is Labor Law

Written on January 3, 2010 by admin

Filed Under: Labor Law

Generally, what is labor law?

Labor law or employment law is the body of laws, administrative rulings, and precedents which addresses the legal rights of, and restrictions on, workers and their organisations. As such, it mediates many aspects of the relationship between trade unions, employers and employees. In some countries (such as Canada), employment laws related to unionised workplaces are differentiated from those relating to particular individuals. In most countries however, no such distinction is made.
The function and origins of labor law
Labor law arose due to the demands of workers for better conditions and the right to organise, and the simultaneous demands of employers to restrict the powers of workers’ organisations and keep labour costs low. Employers costs can increase due to workers organising to win better wages, or by laws emposing costly requirements, such as health and safety or equal opprtunities conditions. Workers’ organisations, such as trade unions, can also transcend purely industrial disputes, and gain political power – certain interests in society may be opposed to this. The state of labour law at any one time is therefore both the product of, and a component of the conditions for, struggles between different interests in society.

For example, workers’ and trade union legal rights in the USA are relatively restricted, compared to most European countries, but relatively liberal compared to totalitarian regimes – many of which ban trade unions altogether.
Important issues in labor law
There are two broad categories of labour law. That relating to employees’ rights at work, and that governing the activity of trade unions and other workers’ organisations. Matters relating to employees rights and obligations in relations to trade unions are best dealt with in the second category.
Trade unions and workers’ organisations
Trade unions (or ‘labor unions’) are the form of workers’ organisation most commonly defined and legislated on in labour law. However, they are not the only variety. In the USA, for example, ‘workers’ centres’ are associations not bound by all of the law relating to trade unions.
Strikes
Strike action is the weapon of the workers most associated with industrial disputes, and certainly among the most powerful. In most countries, strikes are legal under a circumscribed set of conditions. Among them may be that:

The strike is decided on by a proscribed democratic process.
Hence, wildcat strikes are illegal.
Sympathy strikes, against a company by which workers are not directly employed, may be prohibited.
General strikes may be forbidden under pretext of public order
Certain categories of person may be forbidden to strike (airport personnel, health personnel, police or firemen, etc.)
Strikes may be pursuied by people continuing to work, as in Japan or in hospitals

Pickets
Picketing is a tactic which is often used by workers during strikes. They may congregate outside the business which they are striking against, in order to make their presence felt, increase worker participatoin and dissuade (or prevent) strike breakers from entering the place of work. In many countries, this activity will be restricted both by labour law, by more general law restricting demonstrations, or sometimes by injunctions on particular pickets. For example, labour law may restrict secondary picketing, or flying pickets. There may be laws against obstructing others from going about their lawful business (scabing, for example, is lawful); making obstructive pickets illegal. And in some counries, such as Britain, there may be court orders made from time to time against pickets being in particular places or behaving in particular ways (shouting abuse, for example).
Boycotts
A boycott is a refusal to buy, sell, or otherwise trade with an individual or business who is generally believed by the participants in the boycott to be doing something morally wrong.
Unofficial industrial action
Throughout history, workers have used tactics such as the go-slow, sabotage or just not turning up en-masse in order to gain more control over the workplace environment, or simply have to work less [1]. Some labour law explicitly bans such activity, none explicitly allows it.
Trade unions and their members
The law of some countries place requirements on unions to follow particular procedures before certain courses of action are adopted. For example, the requirement to ballot the membership before a strike, or in order to take a portion of members’ dues for political projects. Laws may guarantee the right to join a union (banning employer discrimination), or remain silent in this respect. Some legal codes may allow unions to place a set of obligations on their members, including the requirement to follow a majority decision in a strike vote. Some restrict this, such as the ‘right to work’ legislation in some of the United States.
Rights at work

Equal opportunities in recruitment, pay and treatment

Minimum wages
There may be law stating the minimum amount that a worker can be paid per hour. Both Britain and the USA have a law of this kind, though the figure provided for in the USA is so low as to sometimes be insufficient for the means of a worker’s subsistence. In response to this, Living wage ordinances have been passed by many city authorities in the United States, which define a minimum wage for employees of those authorities, and sometimes for the employees of companies with which the authority contracts. These, therefore, constitute law, albeit not law whch restricts businesses in general.
Rights to consultation, fair treatment, and against unfair dismissal

Hours of labor and holidays
Before the Industrial Revolution, the workday varied between 11 and 14 hours. With the growth of capitalism and the introduction of machinery, longer hours became far more common, with 14-15 hours being the norm, and 16 not at all uncommon. Use of child labour was commonplace, often in factories. In England and Scotland in 1788, about two-thirds of person working in the new water-powered textile factories were children ([1]).

The first law on the length of a working day was passed in 1833 in England, limiting miners to 12 hours, and children to 8 hours. The 10-hour day was established in 1848, and shorter hours with the same pay were gradually accepted thereafter.

After England, Germany was the first European country to pass labor laws; Chancellor Bismarck’s main goal being to undermine the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). In 1878, Bismarck instituted a variety of anti-socialist measures, but despite this, socialists continued gaining seat in the Reichstag. The Chancellor, then, adopted a different approach to tackling socialism. In order to appease the working class, he enacted a variety of paternalistic social reforms, which became the first type of social security. The year 1883 saw the passage of the Health Insurance Act, which entitled workers to health insurance; the worker paid two-thirds, and the employer one-third, of the premiums. Accident insurance was provided in 1884, whilst old age pensions and disability insurance were established in 1889. Other laws restricted the employment of women and children. These efforts, however, were not entirely successful; the working class largely remained unreconciled with Bismarck’s conservative government.

In France, the first labor law was voted in 1841. However, it only limited under-age miners’ hours, and it was not until the Third Republic that labor law was effectively enforced, in particular after Waldeck-Rousseau 1884 law legalizing trade unions.
Health and safety
Other labor laws involve safety concerning workers. The earliest English factory law was drafted in 1802 and dealt with the safety and health of child textile workers. For discussion of modern workplace safety laws, see Occupational safety and health.

Resource: http://www.a-law.org/articles/article-3.html

Severance Agreements

Written on February 27, 2009 by admin

Filed Under: Labor Law

Frequently Asked Questions about Severance Agreements

Q: Is there a law that requires employers to accommodate severance pay?

No. An employer has no obligation to accommodate severance pay. The alone account that administration acquire to by law accommodate is unemployment compensation.

 

Q: I heard that my employer has a severance plan. If so, am I advantaged to benefits?

If an employer creates a severance plan, the advisers covered by the Agreement of the plan are advantaged to the allowances that the plan provides aloft the accident of the accident that triggers benefits. However, an employer may create, adapt or abate a severance plan as it sees fit. A lot of administration acquire to acquire no severance plan at all.

If your employer has a severance plan, you are advantaged to a accounting arbitrary description of it. The plan description will acquaint you what, if anything, you are advantaged to receive.

 

Q: My employer offered a severance Agreement to me, but I acquire to accede not to sue my employer in adjustment to acquire any severance benefits. Can they do that?

Yes. So continued as the employer writes the plan to action a absolution of rights (i.e., a affiance not to sue) on transaction of any severance benefits, you acquire to accede not to sue your employer in adjustment to acquire them.

 

Q: The severance agreement offered to me gives me 21 (or 45) canicule to accede it. What does this mean? Can I acquire it afore that time?

In adjustment for your affiance not to sue for age bigotry to be enforceable, administration acquire to accord you time to accede any offer. This is advised to anticipate “gun to the head” decisions by employees. As a acknowledged amount the employer cannot abolish the action during the cat-and-mouse period, giving you time to accede it. However, the cat-and-mouse aeon is for your benefit. Generally speaking, if you wish to acquire the action afore the end of the cat-and-mouse period, you can do so.

 
 Q: What happens to the waiting period if I ask my employer for a better package?
 
Technically, already you ask for a bigger amalgamation you acquire “rejected” the administration action by authoritative a “counteroffer”, which the employer can acquire or reject. Therefore, you run the accident of accident the affirmed action by authoritative a counteroffer. However, in convenance a lot of administration will not abolish their action if you accomplish a counteroffer, but will leave their aboriginal action on the table if they do not wish to accommodate it. To be clear, though, you acquire to be able to lose the action if you accomplish a counteroffer.

 

Q: I am absorbed to acquire the severance package, but I do not apperceive what, if anything, my rights are account that I will be giving up. What should I do?

Consult acknowledged admonition to appraise any claims that you may have. Find out what your claims are account if you were to win, the affairs that you acquire of acceptable and the attorneys’ fees and cloister costs that you will pay in an accomplishment to win. You should again analyze this (plus the affliction and ambiguity of litigating) to the allowances offered by your employer.

 

Q: Are there any “rules of thumb” for how abundant severance an employer will pay?

No, but we will action some anyways.. Again, an employer has no obligation to accommodate severance payments. Administration rarely action severance pay to alternate workers. Administration who action severance will about accommodate one anniversary per year of account to advisers beneath the administrator or controlling rank, and up to a ages per year of account to admiral and officers. In addition, some severance affairs cap allowances at a defined level, such as one anniversary or ages of severance pay for the aboriginal 18 years of employment