<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Labor Law Journal &#187; Labor Prof &#187; 9th Cir. First Amendment/Labor Law Heading to En Banc Review</title>
	<link>http://www.laborattorney.info/journal/</link>
	<description>Labor Law Journal &#187; Labor Prof &#187; 9th Cir. First Amendment/Labor Law Heading to En Banc Review</description>
	<generator>Gregarius 0.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title>Labor Prof: 9th Cir. First Amendment/Labor Law Heading to En Banc Review</title>
		<link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2010/03/9th-cir-first-amendmentlabor-law-heading-to-en-banc-review.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2010/03/9th-cir-first-amendmentlabor-law-heading-to-en-banc-review.html</guid>
	    				<author>laborprof lpb</author>		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Ask and ye shall receive. In this case, that means my wishes were granted in the Ampersand case where I argued a panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled inappropriately that granting a 10(j) injunction would cause First Amendment speech and... ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
